150 Discussion Topics on the Amendments of the Insolvency Law

Authors： Masaki Nogami Tomohiro Kitano
Publisher：Kinzai Institute for Financial Affairs, Inc.
Date of publication： November, 2014

Other publications by Masaki Nogami

2022.06.10
Guidelines Concerning Business Revitalization, etc. of Small and Medium Enterprises (3) - Out-of-Court Restructuring Proceedings for Business Closures
2021.03.09
Restructuring Plan (Repayment Plan) for Business Rehabilitation of Group Companies
2020.07.14
Restructuring Businesses of Companies Struggling in the COVID-19 Pandemic
2019.10.08
Formulation of a Restructuring Plan under which the Restructuring Company will Pay Debts using its Revenue
2019.05.14
Introduction to Special Conciliation Proceedings for Corporate Restructuring
2018.12.11
Are You Familiar with the Work of a Business Rehabilitation Lawyer?
2016.10.01
140 Q&As on the Practice of Out-of-court Arrangements for Liquidation
2016.03.01
Case Report on the Use of ADR in a Business Turnaround and Guidelines on Personal Guarantees by Business Owners in an Attempt to Comprehensively Work Out Debts
2015.12.15
Commentaries on the Bankruptcy Act (Vol. 1)
2014.11.05
“New ‘DIP-style’ Company Reorganization Proceedings, which are Binding on Security Interests and Preferred Claims” and “How to Deal with the Cancellation/Invalidation of Agreements in relation to the Right of Separate Satisfaction (betsujyo-ken kyotei)”
2014.07.31
100 Q&As on the Practice of Out-of-court Arrangements for Liquidation: A Supplement
2014.02.01
Hasan-kanzai BASIC (The Basics of Trusteeship)
2013.12.01
120 Q&As on the Practice of Corporate Reorganization
2013.06.10
Symposium: “Toward the Restructuring of the Insolvency Legal System”
2013.03.21
A Study on the Disclosure of Information to Creditors
2012.03.02
An Essay on the ‘DIP-style’ Company Reorganization Proceedings, which are Binding on Security Interests and Preferred Claims
2011.05.25
DIP-style’ Company Reorganization Cases of the Osaka District Court
2010.10.05
Practice Manual for Civil Rehabilitation Proceedings
2010.01.26
Retail Business (2) – Tenant’s Right to Claim for Return of Deposits
2005.07.01
Theory/Practice on the New Insolvency Law and Forms Therefor (for Bankruptcy of Business Operators)
2004.03.03
Theory/Practice on New Corporate Reorganization Proceedings for the Practice of Trusteeship, and Forms Therefor
2003.12.10
Company Splits/Mergers in Corporate Rehabilitation Proceedings

MORE

Other publications by Tomohiro Kitano

2023.01.31
Signs of the Introduction of a Majority Vote-based Out-of-Court Liquidation Procedure – The Direction of New Legislation for Business Restructuring -
2022.05.09
Guidelines Concerning Business Revitalization, etc. of Small and Medium Enterprises (2) - Out-of-Court Restructuring Proceedings
2021.09.14
Establishment of Provisions for Pre-DIP Financing and Protection of Commercial Claims in the Rehabilitation Support Procedures under the Small and Medium Enterprises Turnaround Support Committee Scheme
2020.08.11
Various Issues Anticipated in Business Restructuring Cases after the Novel Coronavirus Pandemic
2019.11.12
General Description of Business Revitalization ADR Procedures
2019.06.11
Recommendation to Use Business Revitalization ADR Procedures
2018.08.14
A case in which the Court held that, if a bankruptcy creditor has been partly repaid for its claims by a third-party collateral provider after the commencement of the bankruptcy proceedings, and the amount of distribution calculated on the claim amount that was fixed as of the commencement of the bankruptcy proceedings exceeds the remaining amount of claims under the substantive law, the distribution should be made for such exceeding portion.
2018.07.10
Provisions on Points to Consider for Commercial Receivables in ADR Procedures for Business Revitalization – Amendment of the Act on Strengthening Industrial Competitiveness
2018.05.01
Learning about the Amendment to Laws on Obligations through Case Studies
2015.12.15
Commentaries on the Bankruptcy Act (Vol. 1)
2015.03.03
Supreme Court’s Judgment dated June 5, 2014 concerning the Right of Separate Satisfaction and Its Implications on such Agreements in the Future
2015.03.01
The Supreme Court Decision about the Agreement on the Right of Separate Satisfaction dated June 5, 2014, and Agreements on the Right of Separate Satisfaction in the Future

MORE

Contact us

ページTOPへ