Pantech v Google: Tokyo District Court grants first injunction for SEP infringement（Co-authored）

Please click this URL to check the contents.

Pantech v Google: Tokyo District Court grants first injunction for SEP infringement | Managing Intellectual Property

Authors： Kento Sumi
Publisher：Managing IP
Practice： Intellectual Property Dispute Resolution
Date of publication： July 29, 2025

Other publications by Kento Sumi

2026.06.26
The TRIPP TRAPP Chair Decision: The Supreme Court’s New Standard for Copyright Protection of Mass-Produced Utilitarian Goods
2018.08.28
The Act on Special Measures for Productivity Improvement (Part 2) - Outline of the System to Facilitate Data Sharing and Collaboration
2018.08.10
The Act on Special Measures for Productivity Improvement (Part 1) - What does the “Regulatory Sandbox” mean?

MORE

Other publications about Intellectual Property Dispute Resolution

2026.04.24
Lexology Panoramic - Designs 2026 - Japan Chapter
2026.04.20
JP-DRP Precedent Review Report (2026 Edition)
2026.01.30
(Q67) Principle of Territoriality
2025.07.29
Pantech v Google: Tokyo District Court grants first injunction for SEP infringement（Co-authored）
2025.01.20
Article 10 (Orders to Protect Confidentiality); Article 11 (Rescission of Protective Orders)
2025.01.10
Decision of the Court of First Instance of the Unified Patent Court Central Division (Section Munich)on July 16 2024 — A Central Attack on a Patent for an Antibody Drug Characterized by Means
2024.05.01
Legal Issues Related to Generative AI
2024.04.20
Judgment in Which the Court Determined Whether or Not the Relevant Act Constitutes an Indirect Infringement by a Non-Exclusive Article (Item 2, Article 101 of the Patent Act) Pertaining to Invention of a Product- Requirements for Indirect Infringement by Non-Exclusive Article -
2023.08.24
Thematic-based: Legal Practice in the Healthcare Business
2023.02.28
National Comparison Tables - Japan part
2022.03.01
Summary of Countermeasures for Counterfeit Products in the US
2022.02.04
A Case in Which the Applicability of Article 3, Paragraph 1, Item 3 of the Trademark Act was Disputed with Respect to the Trademark “VEGAS” (Intellectual Property Newsletter (2022 February Issue))
2021.12.01
A Detailed Explanation of Economic Partnership Agreements
2021.08.05
A Case in Which a Court Admission Rendered in the First Trial was Overturned upon Considering Issues of Conventional Technology and Revising Judgment Based on the Fulfillment Theory (Intellectual Property Newsletter (2021 August Issue))
2021.05.07
A Case in Which the Japan Patent Office and the Court Reached Different Decisions Regarding Similarity in the Inventive Step of Two Inventions (Intellectual Property Newsletter (2021 May Issue))
2021.04.01
Patent Enforcement Practices Before, During and After Patent Litigation Proceedings in Japan – A Comparative Analysis with Germany and the United States –
2021.03.05
A Case Involving a Dispute Over Similarity of Trademarks and Other Matters Related to Services Supporting Job Seeking Activities by Currently Unemployed Recent Graduates with Work Experience (Intellectual Property Newsletter (2021 March Issue))
2021.01.26
Intellectual Property Newsletter (Digest version) (2021 Winter Issue) Key Points in Reading Case Reports
2021.01.01
The Ways of Limiting Injunctive Relief in Patent Infringement Litigation and their Effects – Current Japanese Practices and Suggestions for their Future Improvements, based on the Recent Trends in Germany and the United States –
2020.09.10
Analysis of Domestic Court Cases concerning Inventions Related to Computer Software (CS)
2020.08.13
Consideration on the Bill of the Act Partially Amending the Plant Variety Protection and Seed Act — For the Protection of New Varieties of Plants
2019.07.10
A Case in Which Production, Transfer, etc. of Software was Found to Constitute Indirect Infringement of an Invention of a Device (Article 101, Item (ii) of the Patent Act)
2019.05.30
Q13: Inventiveness (4) — Methods of Business; Q42: Application (2) — Supporting Requirements, etc.; and Q76: Terms of Claims
2019.05.10
Analysis of Recent Trends in Case Court Cases Regarding Inventive Step
2019.01.01
Business and IP commitments in Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs)
2018.07.06
7. Multiple Rightholders
2018.05.28
Transfer
2018.03.21
The Compass for Intellectual Property Law - The Supreme Court Ruled on a Re-defense based on a Correction of Claims against a Patent Invalidity Defense in a Patent Infringement Case
2018.03.01
IP Laws of the Philippines
2018.02.19
Q&A on the Actual Practice of Employee Inventions (Keiso’s Law and Practice Series)(co-author)
2017.09.29
“Significant Effects” in Pharmaceutical Inventions as Seen in Recent Court Cases of Litigation Rescinding JPO's Trial/Appeal Decision Concerning Patent
2015.03.20
Chapter 2: Inoventive Steps in the Chemical and Pharmaceutical Fields
2015.02.01
Reading of U.S. Supreme Court Cases: Commentary on Intellectual Property and Business Cases in the 21st Century
2014.11.20
Antibody Drugs: "Correction of Error" in a Claim That Includes Identification Based on Amino Acid Sequence
2014.11.10
U.S. Supreme Court Decision in the Myriad Case and Its Implications
2014.09.05
Article 10 (Orders to Protect Confidentiality); Article 11 (Rescission of Protective Orders)
2013.08.10
U.S. Supreme Court Decision in the Myriad Case (June 13, 2013) — Eligibility of Gene Patents as Subject Matter of Patent Protection
2012.04.11
Ⅲ-2. Claims by Multiple Rightsholders
2011.10.05
Scope of "Action Involving Patent Right" -- Freezing System Case
2010.11.19
Ⅲ. Exhaustion of Patent Right — Ink Cartridge Case
2007.06.25
Chapter 3, Section 1, Ⅲ. Research/Technology Service Contracts
2007.05.01
Commentary on FTA/EPA Negotiations
2006.04.01
Guide to International Legal Practice (1) to (11)

MORE

Contact us

ページTOPへ