NFT Mechanism and Legal Issues of NFT Transactions
NFT is a non-fungible Token. I think that many people have recently heard the word. NFT was originally a hot topic in the cryptocurrency-related industry, but recently, coupled with the news that major companies are entering the NFT business, I feel the general awareness is growing. The news of the auction in 2021 is famous as one of the reasons why NFT attracted global attention. This is an NFT work of a digital artist called "Beeple" that was not very high profile at the time on the March of the same year ("Everyday ‒ The First 5000 Days") was valued at about 7.5 billion yen at auction.
In addition, the NFT Marketplace is a marketplace that helps artists convert digital art into NFT and provides a place for NFT transactions. It is also increasing rapidly. OpenSea, one of the major NFT marketplaces, is witnessing the expansion of the NFT-related market, with the total distribution in 2021-8 reaching about 3650 billion yen, which is more than 10 times the previous month's growth. If you are involved as a party in a transaction involving a business that originates from such a new technology, it is essential to understand the content of that technology and its legal impact on the transaction to protect your rights and prevent disputes in advance. In this paper, we outline the significance of NFT and the technology that is the source of its value, and examine the legal issues related to NFT, especially matters to be considered in formulating rules for NFT transactions related to digital art.
II. Features and mechanisms of NFT
1. Features of NFT
Before we outline the features and technical aspects of NFT, we will explain NFT transactions on the NFT marketplace using diagrams to give an image of what NFT is like.
First, digital art artists can apply specific blockchain standards (e.g. ERC-721 in Ethereum blockchain) and issue a token with a unique ID in compliance with this policy. In this way, tokens that have their own unique value and do not have an alternative to other tokens are called NFT. When publishing this NFT, artists can link the NFT to the digital art they have created. This is sometimes called the "NFTize" of digital art. It is now possible to prove that it is the original through the possession of NFT.
Artists can sell NFT linked to digital art in the NFT marketplace as described above. Users of the marketplace can find and purchase this NFT, and the transaction history at this time will be recorded on the blockchain. In this way, NFT is a landmark technology in that it gives scarcity and asset value to digital art, which was previously easily reproducible.
The above is an example of how to use NFT in relation to digital art, but NFT generally has the following characteristics.
Originality is unique in that NFT itself has a unique value and there are no other tokens. This unique value is recorded on the blockchain, and its tampering is very difficult, so it can be said that this uniqueness is highly reliable. By using this, we can add rarity to content linked to NFT, and we can say that we have a high affinity with markets where the rarity of goods is important for value-added, such as art, trading cards, fashion or music.
Traceability is a feature that focuses on NFT holder information. At the same time as the NFT is issued, the holder is recorded on the blockchain, and all subsequent transactions are also recorded on the blockchain. Thus, the buyer can trust the seller to be the current holder of the NFT (and, consequently, the content associated with it), and can trade with peace of mind. It can be said that the characteristic with meaning in the market where "who owns" has an important meaning for commodity value.
Portability is one of the features of NFT. This is a feature of NFT's distributivity. For example, in the past, digital items purchased in a certain game could, in principle, be used only in the relevant game. However, since the data held by NFT is recorded on a blockchain that does not belong to any game, it has the potential to realize the use of NFT items purchased in one game in another game.
In addition, NFT can set various trading conditions in advance using the mechanism called smart contract. This is the programmability of NFT. Smart contracts are "programs that store contracts written in programming language or machine language on the blockchain, verify the validity of the contract mechanically by the participants of the system, and automatically execute the contract." Ethereum, a representative blockchain where NFT is issued, has also a smart contract. With this smart contract, artists can achieve returns similar to resale right adopted in the EU. Resale right refers to the right of the author to receive a portion of the transaction amount when the work is resold to a third party, and this is a system that is not currently recognized under Japanese copyright law. However, by setting the condition on the smart contract at the time of NFT issuance, "I as the issuer receive 5% of the purchase price each time NFT is bought and sold", it becomes possible to receive revenue return like the resale right.
2. Mechanism of NFT
The innovative feature of NFT lies in its unique nature, but what kind of technology is this unique feature secured? It is useful to review the technical aspects of NFT when considering legal issues related to NFT transactions, which will be discussed below, and I will outline it here.
As mentioned earlier, Ethereum is a typical blockchain that can issue NFT, but Ethereum has a token standard called ERC (Ethereum Request for Comments), and ERC-721 is often used as the issuing standard for NFT. The data structure of the NFT issued based on ERC-721 is shown in the following figure, and information such as token ID, holder address, token URI (Uniform Resource Identifier) is recorded on the blockchain. This token ID is a unique value that makes the token unique, and this is how the irreplacability of the token is guaranteed. A token URI is an attribute that indicates the location of content information (metadata) associated with an NFT. As metadata, the name of the content, description, URL of the data (Uniform Resource Locator), etc. can be described.
The token URI recorded on the blockchain as NTF indicates the location of the metadata, and the URL of the content data in the metadata indicates the location of the content data, and the content data is tied to the NFT.It should be noted that since the data size that can be recorded on the blockchain is not large, metadata and content data itself are mostly managed outside the blockchain (off-chain).
III. Legal Issues Related to NFT Transactions
1. Organizing Concepts
Based on the above understanding, we will consider the legal issues related to the transaction of NFT linked to digital art below. Specifically, as a prerequisite for consideration, we will arrange related concepts legally, and explain the matters to be considered in the formulation of rules for NFT transactions linked to digital art. Therefore, in this section, we will first sort out the concepts related to the above transactions.
First, the term "NFT digital art" in the following refers to digital art that is linked to NFT and managed outside the blockchain. Since only tangible objects are subject to ownership under civil law, NFT digital art, which is data, is not subject to legal ownership. However, if it is "a creative expression of thought or emotion" (Article 2, Paragraph 1, Item 1 of the Copyright Act), the NFT digital art will become a work and the creator will be entitled to a copyright. In the event of copyright infringement, the creator of the digital art can claim the injunction of the infringement and compensation for the damage suffered from the person who infringes the copyright. The creator may also grant permission to third parties to use NFT Digital Art.
On the other hand, when simply referred to as "NFT" in the following, it refers to the token itself as data recorded on the blockchain. The content of NFT data usually does not itself contain content data, so NFT digital art associated with NFT is separate data from NFT.
While NFT and NFT digital art are sometimes confused and explained, it is important to distinguish between the two concepts when considering what is the subject of the transaction and what legal rights the buyer can acquire in the transaction related to NFT.
2. Legal perspectives to consider when developing rules for transactions related to NFT Digital Art
(2) The perspective of protecting the rights of NFT purchasers
(i) Problems inherent in NFT transactions
First, NFT transaction-specific issues related to the rights of the person who purchased the NFT can be considered as follows:
Buyers in the NFT marketplace will consider purchasing an NFT in the hope that they will gain a position as if they "own" the NFT digital art associated with the NFT through their ownership of the NFT. However, as mentioned above, NFT digital art is not subject to ownership, so holding NFT will not legally own NFT digital art. In addition, since the data is separate from NFT and NFT digital Art, even if the buyer of NFT receives the transfer of NFT, it does not acquire copyright, which is a legal right about NFT digital Art, and it is only possible to acquire the right to use NFT digital Art if there is an agreement on a license between the parties. In this way, the gap between what NFT buyers expect from NFT holdings and what legal status they can actually acquire is considered to be one of the inherent problems in transactions related to NFT (The First Problem).
In addition, an artist may convert one digital art into an NFT and sell it to a third party on the NFT Marketplace, and then convert the same digital art into an NFT again on the marketplace or another NFT marketplace. Since there are no technical restrictions on the number of times the same digital art is converted to NFT, there is a possibility that the value of the right to use NFT or NFT digital art of NFT buyers may be diluted after the fact (The Second Problem).
Furthermore, as mentioned above, since NFT and NFT digital art are managed in different locations, it can be said that the outcome of both data does not coincide is a problem inherent in NFT transactions. In other words, after the NFT purchase, only the NFT digital art associated with the NFT may disappear, or the server to which the NFT digital Art is stored may terminate the service and the NFT purchaser may no longer be able to access the NFT digital art (The Third Problem).
(ii) Matters to be considered in the formulation of rules
In terms of the First Problem, as a means to reduce the above gap, it is possible to use the licensing of the art by the copyright holder of the NFT digital art to the purchaser of the NFT. The license by the copyright owner gives NFT purchasers the legal right to use NFT digital art, which means that the NFT purchaser's purpose of having legal rights in NFT digital art is fulfilled to a certain extent. As a method of licensing to NFT purchasers, as shown in the figure below, the copyright holder grants the NFT Marketplace "the right to license NFT digital art to NFT holders" at the same time as the NFT exhibition, and the NFT Marketplace grants licenses to NFT holders in accordance with the transfer of NFT.
(3) Viewpoint of protection of rights of copyright holders
(i) Problems inherent in NFT transactions
Next, we look at issues specific to NFT transactions related to the rights of authors to issue NFT.
Originally, digital art had a problem that it could be easily accessed by third parties other than the copyright holder due to the characteristics of taking the form of data. NFT can be the beginning of giving digital art a unique and asset value, but it should be noted that the above problems still remain. That is, there is a problem that a third party who is not a copyright owner can convert NFT digital art into NFT without permission from the copyright owner (The Fourth Problem).
In addition, as mentioned above, copyright holders can use smart contracts to receive profit returns similar to retroactive rights. However, at present, each NFT marketplace uses a smart contract of its own specifications, and the copyright owner relies on this to set the profit return, so the program related to the profit return may not be activated in other NFT marketplaces or relative transactions (The Fifth Problem).
(ii) Matters to be considered in the formulation of rules
In terms of the Fifth Problem, as a prerequisite for discussion, there is a question of whether the program described in the smart contract will form the content of agreement between the parties to the transaction. In this regard, "Infrastructure development according to the data・driven society in Japan 2017 (survey on technology and systems corresponding to distributed systems)" report states as follows.
"It is considered necessary for the contracting parties to recognize the basic mechanism that contracts described in machine language is automatically made based on certain instructions from the parties and to agree to use of smart contracts in advance. It is not necessary to give explicit consent to the results of the operation again, but it is required to make a common understanding of society, which is the basis for the conclusion of the agreement, through the explanation of the service, the terms and contracts for the use of the system, and the common understanding of society.”
Next, regarding the implementation of the profit reduction system, from the viewpoint of protecting the rights of copyright holders, it is desirable to introduce a profit reduction system of common standards between NFT marketplaces. However, as an NFT marketplace, it is natural to want to adopt a unique profit reduction system to give trading incentives in their own marketplace, and in this case, it can be said that the interests of the NFT marketplace and the copyright owner are conflicting, so it may not be realistic to expect NFT marketplaces to voluntarily adopt a common profit reduction system with each other. In view of the fact that it has become easier to supplement art transactions with the advent of new technology called NFT, there is a legislative approach in Japan that allows the right to follow-up under copyright law. Alternatively, a standard on the blockchain that has a profit reduction system mechanism is developed in advance, and this will become the de facto standard for the entire industry, thereby realizing a profit reduction system that goes beyond the NFT marketplaces.
As mentioned above, in particular, from the viewpoint of protecting the rights of NFT purchasers and copyright holders, we considered the problems inherent in NFT transactions related to digital art, and explained the matters to be considered in creating rules to respond to these problems. There are a wide range of other matters to be considered in the formulation of rules for NFT transactions, including the responsibility of the NFT Marketplace itself and the prevention of fraud such as money laundering. We hope that this article will help those who may be involved as a party in NFT transactions to conduct legal examination of such transactions in the future.
The contents of this article are intended to provide general information only, based on data available as of the date of writing. They are not offered as advice on any particular matter, whether legal or otherwise, and should not be taken as such. The author and Oh-Ebashi LPC & Partners expressly disclaim all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this article. No reader should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any matter contained in this article without seeking specific professional advice.
- 国際知財司法シンポジウム2023 ～アジアにおける知的財産紛争解決～
- うっかりではすまされない 営業秘密の侵害リスクと企業に求められる対応
- 消費者庁による景表法違反調査への対応 〜初期対応から行政処分前後の対応まで〜
- 【BUSINESS LAWYERSセミナー】個人情報コンプライアンスの基礎と重要事例
- 1時間で理解するCookieコンプライアンス ～改正電気通信事業法を踏まえて～
- Workshop & Invention Business Contest
- Workshop on patent information retrieval via patent databases for research and development technology
- Patent Information Search Seminar & Contest - Training on Patent Information Retrieval (Patent Search) and Patent Search Competition on Innovative Technical Solutions for Business -
- 【WEBセミナー】契約深堀シリーズ３ 「消費者向け規約を考える（Eコマース編）」
- Seminar and Business Invention Competition - Study, Research and Dissemination of Patent Information -
- 【オンラインセミナー：録画配信】契約実務の基礎 共同研究開発契約・ライセンス契約
- 【オンラインセミナー：録画配信】英語で学ぶ英文契約書の基礎と実務 第3回：License Agreement - An Explanation of Selected Key Points
- 【オンラインセミナー】英語で学ぶ英文契約書の基礎と実務 第3回：License Agreement - An Explanation of Selected Key Points
- Workshops and Contests on IP Information exploitation on IPPLATFORM - Retrieval Education and Dissemination -
- Workshops and Invention Business Contests on Patent Information Retrieval Education and Dissemination
- 2021年度医療イノベーション人材養成プログラム 特別講演会
- 国際知財司法シンポジウム2021 ‐アジアにおける知的財産紛争解決‐
- -トライボロジー会議2021 春 東京-「著作権とＣＣライセンスについて」
- 第6回 医療IT EXPO「個人情報保護法の統合方針と医療現場への影響」
- 国際的な個人情報の取扱における説明責任と透明性 − 医学研究を題材に
- DSEI Japan Conference 2019
- NYSBA International Section - Global Conference 2019 - Panel 11 Cross-Border Protection of Design
- 知的財産に関する研修会2019 - 立法・判例の最新動向を踏まえて-
- The Legal 500 GC Summit Japan 2019
- 【東京】本年7月1日施行 改正不正競争防止法セミナー
- 【名古屋】本年7月1日施行 改正不正競争防止法セミナー
- 【受託者・下請事業者向け】 トラブルを防ぐシステム開発契約の結び方
- 90分で確認！ 日本、中国及びシンガポールにおけるeコマースコンプライアンス概要
- フィリピン法務アップデート ～フィリピンにおける新しいビジネス展開のヒント～
- ビッグデータ/IoT時代のデータを巡る法的課題 ～保護と利活用の両面から～
- EU 個人情報規制(GDPR)対応セミナー
- EU 一般データ保護規則（GDPR）の概要と対応
- EU 一般データ保護規則（GDPR）の概要と対応
- 国際的観点からみた知的財産訴訟の実務とこれから ~設樂知財高裁前所長に聞く~
- 2017 中小企業のための知財活性化セミナー ~三重県企業の知財戦略強化に向けて~
- 【名古屋】 中国・ASEANにおける知的財産権の管理
- 【2回シリーズセミナー】第2回 中国、日本、米国における特許訴訟の戦略的対応
- 【東京】 中国・ASEANにおける知的財産権の管理
- 【2回シリーズセミナー】第1回 中国・ASEANにおける知的財産権の管理
- テーマ別 ヘルスケア事業の法律実務
- National Comparison Tables - Japan part
- 「方法特許の消尽論 「モノ」から「コト」への産業構造変化を踏まえて」
- BtoC Eコマース実務対応
- 海外 AI ベンチャー企業との共同研究に関する契約上の留意点
- サイバー攻撃で情報流出！ 企業の法的責任は？
- Legal Compliance of Workplace Surveillance in China -From a Personal Information Protection Perspective
- Legal Protection of Big Data in Japan
- 詳解 経済連携協定
- データ越境安全評価弁法（意見募集稿）について ～留意すべき基本ポイント～
- 『ネットワーク安全法』施行後の4年を振り返って （一）
- 知的財産に関するNewsletter（ダイジェスト版）2021年冬号 判例の解説ポイント
- The Japan Cybersecurity module
- 「保護の始期と保護期間の起算点」 －スティック状加湿器事件－
- リレー連載 ある日の知財弁護士♯35 「知財弁護士業務の魅力」
- 「基礎から学ぶデジタル・フォレンジック 入門から実務での対応まで」
- The "Sharing Economy" in Japan
- 生産性向上特別措置法（後編）～データ共有・連携の支援 制度概要
- 生産性向上特別措置法(前編) ～規制のサンドボックスとは何か
- 知的財産法の羅針盤 特許権侵害訴訟における訂正の再抗弁のあり方
- 職務発明の実務Q&A [勁草法律実務シリーズ]
- 会社法、著作権法、特許法等 押さえておくべき重要な法改正のポイント
- 「年々重要性を帯びる情報セキュリティ（コンピュータフォレンジック最前線 第1回）」
- 「証拠の真正性とその破棄・改ざん（コンピュータフォレンジック最前線 第3回）」
- 「コンピュータ技術に追いつかない法整備（コンピュータフォレンジック最前線 第4回）」
- 「サイバースペースにおける法の適用（コンピュータフォレンジック最前線 第5回）」
- 「実践的eディスカバリ 米国民事訴訟に備える」